Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
PlusPass, Inc. v. Verra Mobility Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv10078
Defendant: Verra Mobility Corp., Platinum Equity LLC, The Gores Group LLC and others
Plaintiff: PlusPass, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Hertz Global Holdings Inc, AVIS Budget Group, Inc. and Enterprise Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation - Opt Out Cases
as 1:2014md01720
Defendant: Affiliated Foods Midwest Cooperative, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A. and others
Plaintiff: Airtran Airways, Inc, Alaska Air Group, Inc., Alaska Airlines, Inc. and others
323) 931-4990 (fax: Little Pub Holdings, LLC and Tavern Hospitality Group Holdings, LLC
Objector: National Federation of Independent Businesses and Vicente Consulting LLC
In Re: Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation - Opt Out Cases
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company et al v. Visa, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00276
Plaintiff: Avis Budget Group, Inc., Avis Rent A Car System LLC, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. and others
Defendant: Mastercard Incorporated, Mastercard International Incorporated, Visa International Service Assocation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Michael Shames, et al v. Michael Schulz, et al
as 12-57247
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL SHAMES and GARY GRAMKOW, on behalf of themselves and all persons similarly situated
Objector - Appellant: MICHAEL J SCHULZ
Defendant - Appellee: HERTZ CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, DOLLAR THRIFTY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Michael Shames, et al v. Hertz Corporation, et al
as 12-57205
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL SHAMES and GARY GRAMKOW, on behalf of themselves and all persons similarly situated
Objector - Appellant: ANDREW CESARE, CERY PERLE, GARY BISHOP and others
Defendant - Appellee: HERTZ CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, DOLLAR THRIFTY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Michael Shames, et al v. Hertz Corporation, et al
as 12-57211
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL SHAMES and GARY GRAMKOW, on behalf of themselves and all persons similarly situated
Objector - Appellant: THOMAS J. LAVERY
Defendant - Appellee: HERTZ CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, DOLLAR THRIFTY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Michael Shames, et al v. Gordon Hansmeier, et al
as 12-57026
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL SHAMES and GARY GRAMKOW, on behalf of themselves and all persons similarly situated
Objector - Appellant: GORDON HANSMEIER
Defendant - Appellee: HERTZ CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, DOLLAR THRIFTY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Cassan Enterprises Inc et al v. Avis Budget Group Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01934
Plaintiff: Cassan Enterprises Inc , CMC Investments Inc , Todd Investments Co. and others
Defendant: Avis Budget Group Inc and Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Shames v. Hertz Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-56750
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL SHAMES
Defendant - Appellee: HERTZ CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, DOLLAR THRIFTY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Shames et al v. Hertz Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv02174
Plaintiff: Michael Shames and Gary Gramkow
Defendant: Hertz Corporation, Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc., Avis Budget Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?