Antitrust Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
STATE OF COLORADO et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03715
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. FACEBOOK, INC.
as 1:2020cv03589
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant: FACEBOOK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court: STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant: NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner: AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent: BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. NEXSTAR MEDIA GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv02295
Plaintiff: STATE OF ILLINOIS, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Defendant: TRIBUNE MEDIA COMPANY and NEXSTAR MEDIA GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al v. KONINKLIJKE AHOLD N.V. et al
as 1:2016cv01512
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Defendant: KONINKLIJKE AHOLD N.V. and DELHAIZE GROUP NV/SA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. AETNA INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01494
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF DELAWARE , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Defendant: AETNA INC. and HUMANA INC.
Pecial_master: RICHARD A. LEVIE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. ANTHEM, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01493
Defendant: ANTHEM, INC, CIGNA CORP. and ANTHEM, INC.
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Petitioner: KAISER PERMANENTE HEALTH PLAN, INC., TUFTS ASSOCIATED HEALTH PLANS, INC., MERCER and others
Special Master: RICHARD A. LEVIE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. SPRINGLEAF HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01992
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF COLORADO , STATE OF IDAHO and others
Defendant: SPRINGLEAF HOLDINGS, INC. , ONEMAIN FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, LLC and CITIFINANCIAL CREDIT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. SYSCO CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00256
Defendant: SYSCO CORPORATION, USF HOLDING CORP. and US FOODS, INC.
Plaintiff: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Interested Party: DISTRIBUTION MARKET ADVANTAGE, CHENEY BROTHERS, INC., CULVER FRANCHISING SYSTEM, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant: HPSI PURCHASING SERVICES
Petitioner: XYZ CORPORATION, FOODBUY, LLC and COMPASS GROUP USA, INC.
Amicus Curiae: PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP, INC.
Intervenor: REINHART FOODSERVICE, L.L.C. and SHAMROCK FOODS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 53 b Federal Trade Commission Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. US AIRWAYS GROUP INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01236
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF ARIZONA , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Defendant: US AIRWAYS GROUP INC and AMR CORPORATION
Movant: ALLIED PILOTS ASSOCIATION
Amicu: ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FLIGHT ATTENDANTS , ASSOCIATION OF FLIGHT ATTENDANTS-CWA , TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA and others
Pecial_master: RICHARD A. LEVIE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?