Antitrust Cases
VC, Inc. et al v. Kraft Foods, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv12282
Defendant: Kraft Foods, Inc., Kraft Foods Global, Inc., Nabisco Biscuit Division and others
Plaintiff: VC, Inc., SPTN, Inc. and AFENDI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
PITCO FOODS v. CADBURY ADAMS CANADA, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00888
Plaintiff: PITCO Foods
Defendant: Cadbury Adams Canada, Inc., Cadbury Adams USA LLC, Cadbury Schweppes PLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PITCO FOODS v. CANBURY ADAMS CANADA, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv00942
Plaintiff: PITCO FOODS
Defendant: CANBURY ADAMS CANADA, INC., CADBURY ADAMS USA LLC, CADBURY SCHWEPPES PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Cascade Health, et al v. Peacehealth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 05-35627
Plaintiff - Appellant: CASCADE HEALTH SOLUTIONS FKA MCKENZIE-WILLIAMETTE HOSPITAL, an Oregon nonprofit corporation
Defendant - Appellee: PEACEHEALTH, a Washington State nonprofit corporation
Defendant: PACIFICSOURCE HEALTH PLANS
Defendant-intervenor: REGENCE BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF OREGON, PROVIDENCE HEALTH PLAN and MCKENZIE-WILLIAMETTE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLC
Amicus Curiae: VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ; CATERPILLAR INC., LAW PROFESSORS, DANIEL A. CRANE, THOMAS A. LAMBERT, THOMAS D. MORGAN, D. DANIEL SOKOL, RICHRAD C. SQUIRE., THE CATHOLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Za-Za, Inc., et al v. Eastman Chemical Co., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:1998cv04886
Defendant: Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties & Food Ingredients , Bernd Romahn, Ueno Fine Chemicals Industry, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Ohio Chemical Company , Frito-Lay, Inc. and Pilgrim's Pride
Intervenor: Dean Foods Co. , Kraft Foods, Inc. (GFC) and Ralston Purina Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?