Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Company v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv13461
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Health Service and Indeminty Company
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. , Novartis AG and Novartis Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
CARITEN INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. ASTRAZENECA AB et al
as 1:2014cv13873
Plaintiff:
CARITEN INSURANCE COMPANY , EMPHESYS INSURANCE COMPANY , HUMANA BENEFIT PLAN OF ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Defendant:
Astrazeneca AB , Aktiebolaget Hassle , Astrazeneca LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2012md02409
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers Local 595 Health And Welfare Fund, All Plaintiffs, New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Assoc. of New York City, Inc. Health Benefits Fund and others
Interested Party:
CaremarkPCS Health, LLC, Value Drug Company, McKesson Corporation and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ARCADIAN HEALTH PLAN OF LOUISIANA, INC., CARITEN INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Intervenor:
Express Scripts, Inc., Christopher Wirth, Edward Breivik and others
Defendant:
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc., TEVA USA, INC. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation
Petitioner:
Mr. TIMOTHY C. HESTER
In Re:
Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company v. Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
as 1:2011cv12326
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company Inc. v. Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
as 1:2011cv11024
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company Inc.
Defendant:
Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
