Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-521
Plaintiff / Appellee: Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant: DoorDash Inc.
Defendant / Appellant: Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats and Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae: United States Chamber of Commerce
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-522
Plaintiff / Appellee: Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant: DoorDash Inc., Postmates Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats
Defendant / Appellant: Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae: United States Chamber of Commerce
Hydraulic Braking Actions
as 2:2021cv04500
Plaintiff: End-Payor Plaintiffs, Halley Ascher, Gregory Asken and others
Defendant: ZF TRW Automotive Holdings Corp, ZF Friedrichshafen AG (the successor in interest into which TRW KFZ Ausrstung GmbH merged), Lucas Automotive GmbH (now known as ZF Active Safety GmbH) (together, TRW) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hydraulic Braking - End Payors
as 2:2021cv04503
Plaintiff: End-Payor Plaintiffs, Halley Ascher, Gregory Asken and others
Defendant: ZF TRW Automotive Holdings Corp, ZF Friedrichshafen AG (the successor in interest into which TRW KFZ Ausrstung GmbH merged), Lucas Automotive GmbH (now known as ZF Active Safety GmbH) (together, TRW) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
End-Payor Plaintiffs
as 2:2021cv11993
Plaintiff: End-Payor Plaintiffs, Halley Ascher, Gregory Asken and others
Defendant: ZF TRW Automotive Holdings Corp, ZF Friedrichshafen AG (the successor in interest into which TRW KFZ Ausrstung GmbH merged), Lucas Automotive GmbH (now known as ZF Active Safety GmbH) (together, TRW) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Eliades et al v. Grubhub Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv05134
Defendant: Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc. and Grubhub Inc.
Plaintiff: John Boisi, Jonathan Swaby, Nathan Obey and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Davitashvili et al v. Grubhub Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03000
Defendant: Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc., DoorDash Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Mia Sapienza, Adam Bensimon and Mariam Davitashvili
Consolidated Plaintiff: Philip Eliades, Jonathan Swaby, John Boisi and others
Not Classified By Court: Cheeseboat Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Frame-Wilson et al v. Amazon.com Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00424
Plaintiff: Christian Sabol, Deborah Frame-Wilson, Gail Murphy and others
Defendant: Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Door Latches Actions
as 2:2017cv04300
Defendant: Brose Fahrzeugteile GmbH & Co. KG, Brose North America, Inc., Brose Schliesysteme GmbH & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft and others
Plaintiff: Rebecca Lynn Morrow, Jessica DeCastro, Edward Muscara and others
In Re: Door Latches Actions
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Door Latches - End-Payor Actions We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv04303
Defendant: Brose Fahrzeugteile GmbH & Co. KG, Brose North America, Inc., Brose Schliesysteme GmbH & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft and others
Plaintiff: Rebecca Lynn Morrow, Jessica DeCastro, Edward Muscara and others
In Re: Door Latches - End-Payor Actions
Not Classified By Court: 113 Class Member Objectors
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?