Cases 1 - 10 of 17
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01430
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., GENERAL MOTORS LLC and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC., ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-420
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re: In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-423
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company and KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-410
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-418
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albertsons Companies, Inc., H-E-B L.P., The Kroger Co. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
County Of Westchester et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04474
Plaintiff:
County Of Westchester, Illinois Public Risk Fund and United Crafts Benefits Fund
Defendant:
ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S. INC., ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
County Of Westchester v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv07893
Plaintiff:
County Of Westchester
Defendant:
Actavis Holdco US, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
County of Albany et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01875
Defendant:
BAUSCH HEALTH AMERICAS, INC., TARO PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC, UDL LABORATORIES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Schuyler, City of Mobile, WCA Group Health Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
County of Albany et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01650
Defendant:
Bausch Health Americas, Inc., Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
County of Schuyler, City of Mobile, WCA Group Health Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CVS PHARMACY, INC. v. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv06310
Defendant:
BAUSCH HEALTH AMERICAS, INC., HERITAGE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MAYNE PHARMA USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
