Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Martin, et al., v. Texas Association of Realtors, Inc., et al.
as 4:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Julie Martin, Mark Adams and Adelaida Matta
Defendant:
Texas Association of Realtors, Inc., Austin Board of Realtors, San Antonio Board of Realtors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Thomas -El v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Company, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv02676
Plaintiff:
Phinehas W. Thomas-El ex rel doing business as Jerry Wayne Thomas Jr.
Defendant:
Nissan Motor Acceptance Company, LLC, Nissan Motor Acceptance Company (NMAC) and Baker Nissan North, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
United Biologics, LLC v. American Academy of Allergy Asthma & Immunology, et al
as 5:2014cv00035
Counter Plaintiff:
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. and Phadia US Inc.
Defendant:
Dallas Allergy and Asthma Center, P.A., Lyndon Mansfield, Tonya Winders and others
Plaintiff:
United Biologies, LLC and Academy of Allergy & Asthma in Primary Care
Petitioner:
El Paso First Health Plan, Inc. and Parkland Community Health Plan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Delta Airlines Inc et al v. Visa Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00621
Plaintiff:
Delta Airlines Inc , Delta Private Jets Inc , MLT Inc and others
Defendant:
Visa Inc, Visa USA Inc, Visa International Service Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
TAJ Construction, Inc. v. Architectural Products Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00381
Plaintiff:
TAJ Construction, Inc., TAJ Construction, Inc., TAJ Construction, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Architectural Products Co., Inc. and El Paso Steel Doors and Frames, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
El Paso Premiere Cinema L.P. v. Cinemark USA
as 3:2007cv00194
Plaintiff:
El Paso Premiere Cinema L.P. and El Paso Premiere Cinema L.P.
Defendant:
Cinemark USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
