Cases 1 - 5 of 5
PSENCIK et al v. CORTEVA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
WALTER PSENCIK and TRAVIS PSENCIK
Defendant:
CORTEVA, INC., SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: CROP PROTECTION PRODUCTS LOYALTY PROGRAM ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2023md03062
In Re:
CROP PROTECTION PRODUCTS LOYALTY PROGRAM ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANDERSON, FREDERICK C. CROSCUT, R & D ADAMS DAIRY FARM, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DAY FARMS, DANNY DAY, JR. FARMS, DANNY DAY, JR. & SON FARM PARTNERSHIP and others
Defendant:
SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA CORPORATION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC and others
Consolidated Defendant:
HELENA AGRI-ENTERPRISES LLC, BASF SE, BASF CORPORATION and others
Interested Party:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
In re: Sanderson and Koch Broiler Chicken Grower Litigation
as 7:2018cv00031
Defendant:
Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Processing Division), Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Food Division), Koch Foods, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Walters, Myles Weaver, Nancy Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Haff Poultry, Inc. et al v. Koch Foods, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
Haff Poultry, Inc. , Nancy Butler , Johnny Upchurch and others
Defendant:
Koch Foods, Inc., Koch Meat Co., Inc., Sanderson Farms, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Polyester Staple Ant v.
as 3:2003cv01516
Plaintiff:
Carolina Mills, Incorporated , American Fiber and Finishing Inc. , Wellington Leisure Products, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Alpek S.A. De C.V. , DuPont E. I. De Nemours & Co. , DAK Americas LLC and others
Movant:
Wellman, Inc. , David Whitley , Jim Casey and others
Material_witne:
Enoch Walter Goldman
Intervenor:
Kaye Scholer, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
