Banks and Banking Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 101
State Natl Bank of Big Spring, et al v. Jacob Lew, et al
as 13-5248
Plaintiff - Appellee: State National Bank of Big Spring, 60 Plus Association, Inc. and Competitive Enterprise Institute
Plaintiff - Appellant: State of South Carolina, State of Oklahoma, State of Michigan and others
Defendant - Appellee: Jacob J. Lew, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Treasury and ex officio Chairman of the Financial Stability Oversight Council, United States Department of the Treasury, Richard Cordray, In his official capacity as Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in his official capacity as ex officio Director of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and in his official capacity as ex officio member of the Finan and others
State Natl Bank of Big Spring, et al v. Jacob Lew, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-5247
Plaintiff - Appellant: State National Bank of Big Spring, 60 Plus Association, Inc. and Competitive Enterprise Institute
Plaintiff - Appellee: State of South Carolina, State of Oklahoma, State of Michigan and others
Defendant - Appellee: Jacob J. Lew, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Treasury, United States Department of the Treasury, Richard Cordray, In his official capacity as Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in his official capacity as ex officio Director of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and in his official capacity as ex officio member of the Finan and others
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Copenhaver et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2013cv02037
Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant: Ronald H. Copenhaver, Corey J. Coughlin, Camden Ted French and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Castro et al
as 9:2013cv80596
Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant: Hugo A. Castro, Robert K. Garrett, Michael E. Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Hamlin v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 1:2013cv00470
Plaintiff: Daniel K. Hamlin
Defendant: The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Martin et al v. Bank of America N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02350
Plaintiff: John Miller, Karen Holloway, Gerald Beamon and others
Defendant: Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., BMO Harris Bank, N.A., OneWest Bank, FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Colbourne et al
as 3:2013cv00351
Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant: Richard K. Colbourne, Rick F. Hall and Martin Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
Wholesale Petroleum Partners, v. South Central Bank of Daviess, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-5081
Plaintiff - Appellant: WHOLESALE PETROLEUM PARTNERS, L.P., A Texas Partnership
Third Party - Appellee: SOUTH CENTRAL BANK OF DAVIESS COUNTY, INC. and WILLIAM K. SAALWAECHTER
Defendant - Appellee: SOUTH CENTRAL BANK OF DAVIESS COUNTY, INC., A Kentucky Corporation and DAVID E. FORT
Michael's Market, Inc. et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Premier Bank
as 1:2012cv09410
Plaintiff: Michael's Market, Inc. , 2820-30 North Cicero, LLC , 4815 W. Wolfram, LLC and others
Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Premier Bank
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1971
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp v. Steven Skow, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-15878
Plaintiff - Appellant: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver for Integrity Bank of Alpharetta, Georgia
Defendant - Appellee: STEVEN SKOW, ALAN K. ARNOLD, DOUGLAS G. BALLARD and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?