Cases 91 - 100 of 18,127
Levi Pruss v. Urgent Response Training, LLC
as 1:2024cv21240
Plaintiff:
Levi Pruss
Defendant:
Urgent Response Training, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Filomena v. Manno-Schurr et al
as 1:2024cv21242
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Filomena
Defendant:
Valerie Manno-Schurr, Robert Klein, David Caballero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HALE v. HALE et al
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
RODRICK HALE
Defendant:
RENEE HALE, TERRENCE HALE, TERRY MITHELL, SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cowart v. Duro et al
as 3:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
William D. Cowart, III
Defendant:
Stone Duro and Tiffany Sen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Becker et al v. Citigroup Inc., d/b/a Citibank et al
as 0:2024cv60834
Plaintiff:
Werner Jack Becker and Dana Guida
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc., d/b/a Citibank and Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hesser v. Becraft Jr.
as 2:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Peter Hesser
Defendant:
Lowel H. Becraft Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Legal Malpractice
Green v. Wilkinson et al
as 8:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
James Green
Defendant:
Police Officer Eric Wilkinson, Police Officer Jonathan Lambert, Policer Officer Corey Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PRUDHOMME v. MICHLES et al
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
ADAM J PRUDHOMME
Defendant:
MARCUS MICHLES, RAINEY BOOTH, ADRIAN BRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Beamer
as 6:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Defendant:
John D.W. Beamer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brutsman v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
as 8:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Michael Brutsman
Defendant:
Raytheon Company and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Other:
Jeffrey Carter Andersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
