Cases 91 - 100 of 38,990
Zhao v. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
as 1:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Tianqi Zhao
Defendant:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carrion v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03805
Plaintiff:
Gary Carrion
Defendant:
PO Shawn Nicholson, PO Melvin Welch, PO Johnmatthew Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Prentiss v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03778
Plaintiff:
Jasheem Prentiss
Defendant:
City of New York, Kieran Ross, Matthew Arvelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lane v. Whinnery et al
as 1:2024cv03774
Plaintiff:
Keith Lane
Defendant:
Melanie Whinnery, Bryon Berge, Brad Lander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woodman v. Finger Lakes Performing Provider System
as 6:2024cv06327
Plaintiff:
Andrea Woodman
Defendant:
Finger Lakes Performing Provider Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Pynn v. Pynn et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Stacey Pynn
Defendant:
Matthew Pynn, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Office of Court Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jiang v. Wang et al
as 1:2024cv03715
Plaintiff:
Ziyao Jiang
Defendant:
Rubby Wang and Jack Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Santiago v. City of Rome et al
as 6:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Larry Santiago
Defendant:
City of Rome, City of Rome Police Department, Officer Joseph Longo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Janczuk v. USA
as 1:2024cv03654
Plaintiff:
Weronika E. Janczuk
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
P.G. et al v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2024cv02318
Plaintiff:
P.G. and P.G. on behalf of her child D.M., a minor
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
