Cases 101 - 110 of 250
Page v. Farnsler et al
as 1:2017cv01563
Plaintiff:
Richard Michael Page
Defendant:
Adam Farnsler and Daniel Klinedinst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATSINGER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ET AL
as 2:2017cv02948
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATSINGER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , BARBARA ADAMS , DONALD ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Donahue v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2017cv01084
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Donahue
Defendant:
Dauphin County, Dauphin County Prison, PA State Capitol Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaus v. Pocono Mountain Regional Police Commission et al
as 3:2017cv01053
Plaintiff:
Gary Gaus
Defendant:
Pocono Mountain Regional Police Commission , David Moyer , Francis Depiano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ADAMS v. HENRY et al
as 5:2017cv02152
Plaintiff:
CINDY L. ADAMS
Defendant:
MICHELLE M. HENRY, JOYCE JOSE, M. JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bivens v. Commonwealth of PA et al
as 1:2017cv00809
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Bivens
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PA, County of Adams, Robert G. Bigham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schrader et al v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2017cv00592
Plaintiff:
Adam J. Schrader and Melissa Schrader
Defendant:
Dauphin County, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Susquehanna Township Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vega v. Oakes et al
as 1:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
Domingo Vega
Defendant:
Adam Oakes, Jeff Buckett, Mark Knezovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMILTON v. PHILADELPHIA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2017cv00970
Plaintiff:
MARILYN L. HAMILTON
Defendant:
ADAM BUCK, JENNA MONLEY, SHERRY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARTOL v. BARROWCLOUGH et al
as 2:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BARTOL
Defendant:
ADAM BARROWCLOUGH , SHAWN RYAN , ANDREW O'NEILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
