Cases 101 - 110 of 191
Edmundson v. The City of Atlanta as a municipality et al
as 1:2016cv04639
Plaintiff:
Jazzmon Edmundson
Defendant:
The City of Atlanta as a municipality , Erika Shields , Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
T. v. Howell et al
as 1:2016cv04524
Plaintiff:
N. T.
Defendant:
Raphael Howell, Erika Rainey, Victor Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. County of Clayton et al
as 1:2016cv04379
Plaintiff:
Debra Denise Curry
Defendant:
County of Clayton, Terry Baskin, Tomisha Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Jackson et al
as 4:2016cv00318
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Taylor
Defendant:
Rodney Jackson , Jose Morales , Shanae Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson et al v. Mixon et al
as 3:2016cv00181
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jackson and Heather Jackson
Defendant:
Eddie Mixon, Jason Blackmon, Andrea Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sonner v. Grevious
as 4:2016cv00312
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Sonner
Defendant:
Jenee Denenne Grevious
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harpo v. Craig et al
as 1:2016cv03965
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo
Defendant:
Daniel J. Craig, Richmond County District Attorney, State Bar of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel et al v. Georgia Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2016cv03512
Plaintiff:
Anthony Daniel and Tessa Clendening
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Human Services , Samantha White , Tamara Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Garcia v. Li et al
as 1:2016cv03333
Plaintiff:
Danielle Garcia
Defendant:
Charles Li, R.L. Butch Conway, Kathryn Schrader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Georgia Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
as 1:2016cv03229
Plaintiff:
Amber Danielle Evans
Defendant:
Georgia Board of Pardons & Paroles, Terry E. Barnard and Rick Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
