Cases 101 - 110 of 136
Rhymes v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. et al
as 5:2010cv02860
Plaintiff:
Georgia M. Rhymes
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., Stephen Dobransky and Shawna Conrad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Tryon et al
as 1:2010cv02786
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Thomas
Defendant:
Stephen M. Tryon, Michael W. Maloney, Larry Reik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Turner et al
as 1:2010cv02579
Plaintiff:
Steven Miller
Defendant:
Kim Turner, Medina County Sheriff's Office , Medina County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zahala v. American Express et al
as 2:2010cv00848
Plaintiff:
Stephen Zahala
Defendant:
American Express, GS Services Limited Partnership, Levy & Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Pronai v. Bell et al
as 2:2010cv00685
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Pronai
Defendant:
Greg A Bell and Marcia C Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dehlendorf v. City Of Gahanna, Ohio et al
as 2:2010cv00623
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Dehlendorf
Defendant:
City Of Gahanna, Ohio, Rebecca Stinchcomb, Dennis Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lilley v. Sunderland et al
as 1:2010cv00228
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Lilley
Defendant:
David Sunderland, Michael E. Powell and Brenda N. Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elendt v. Leeds
as 1:2010cv00087
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Elendt
Defendant:
Stephen R. Leeds
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Galloway v. Swanson et al
as 5:2009cv02834
Plaintiff:
William P. Galloway
Defendant:
Timothy A Swanson, Stark County, Board of Commissioners, Michael McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Boria v. Schismenos et al
as 1:2009cv02620
Plaintiff:
Jonathan K. Boria
Defendant:
Paul Schismenos, Janine England, Daniel Kohler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
