Cases 111 - 120 of 4,115
Q.J. v. PowerSchool Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2023cv05689
Plaintiff:
Q.J.
Defendant:
PowerSchool Holdings LLC, Hobsons, Inc., Heap Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolbert v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv05626
Plaintiff:
Jacob Tolbert
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Thomas M Hanrahan and Matthew Bouch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bates et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv05531
Plaintiff:
Sky Bates and Tutankhamen Lee
Defendant:
City of Chicago, T.J. Alexander and C.E. Alequin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv05121
Plaintiff:
Antawan Smith
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Richard Hanrahan, Todd Gillerain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harry Barnett v. City of Chicago, et al
as 23-2509
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARRY BARNETT
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, ALEXANDER KULISEK and ANITA ALVAREZ
Jones et al v. Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv04975
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Bryan Cox, Peter Theodore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andre Echols, Jr. v. Peter Niznik, et al
as 23-2454
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE L. ECHOLS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER NIZNIK, Officer, Star #9182, EDDIE T. JOHNSON, Former CPD Superintendent, ERIK ALBRIGHT, Officer, Star #11522 and others
Tyler v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv04803
Plaintiff:
Sean Tyler
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Kenneth Boudreau, James O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Boudreau et al
as 1:2023cv04802
Plaintiff:
Reginald Henderson
Defendant:
Officer Kenneth Boudreau, John Halloran, Michael Clancy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe v. Shaw et al
as 1:2023cv04837
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Stephan Shaw and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
