Cases 131 - 140 of 619
Peterson v. Scott et al
as 5:2020cv00149
Plaintiff:
Reuel E. Peterson
Defendant:
Phil Scott and Mark Levine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A.H. et al v. French et al
as 5:2020cv00151
Plaintiff:
Darlene Hester, James Hester, Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington, Vermont and others
Defendant:
Daniel M. French, Michael Clark and South Hero Board of School Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Segar v. Barnett et al
as 2:2020cv00126
Defendant:
LPL Financial, Justin Gregory Wicks, Wicks Finance Strategies and others
Plaintiff:
Elliot Kim Segar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martel et al v. Condos
as 5:2020cv00131
Plaintiff:
Robert Frenier, Raoul Beaulieu, Brian Smith and others
Defendant:
James Condos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Peterson v. Scott
as 5:2020cv00076
Defendant:
Phil Scott
Plaintiff:
Revel E. Peterson and Reuel E. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gadreault v. Bent et al
as 2:2020cv00083
Defendant:
Walter Smith, Phil Danielson, Richard Berlandy and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond R. Gadreault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. Saint Michael's College, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Daniel Dromeshauser and Saint Michael's College, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Skoric v. Killington Ski Resort et al
as 5:2020cv00054
Defendant:
Vermont Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation and Killington Ski Resort
Plaintiff:
Ivo Skoric
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Sanders et al
as 2:2020cv00031
Defendant:
Michael Atkinson, Bernie Sanders, Bill Clinton and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Luhizo v. City of Burlington, Vermont et al
as 2:2020cv00005
Defendant:
City of Burlington, Vermont, Jason Bellavance, Bryan Kirby and others
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Luhizo
Not Classified By Court:
ENE Evaluator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
