Cases 11 - 20 of 169
AHMED v. GABLE et al
as 1:2021cv03333
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD MOKHTAR AHMED
Defendant:
CHARLES H. GABLE, IV, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, DAVID M. BANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
C. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv02992
Plaintiff:
H. C., Ryan Craig, Lynette Craig and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia and District of Columbia Office of the State Superintendent of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
ADAMS v. HEAD et al
as 1:2021cv02670
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
CHRIS HEAD, JOHN EOFF, MARY JEAN CREAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLAYMAN v. RAO et al
as 1:2021cv02473
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN and LARRY ELLIOT KLAYMAN
Defendant:
NEOMI RAO, ROBERT L. WILKINS, LAURENCE H. SILBERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAHONEY v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD et al
as 1:2021cv02314
Plaintiff:
PATRICK J. MAHONEY
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD, KAREN H. GIBSON, WILLIAM J. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
FONTANEZ v. BERBER
as 1:2021cv02073
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO FONTANEZ
Defendant:
DAVID H. BERBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv02038
Plaintiff:
SONIA POWELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEPHEN S. TROTT, THOMAS O. RICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LU v. EID et al
as 1:2021cv01389
Defendant:
CLARK WADDOUPS and ALLISON H. EID
Plaintiff:
YAN-XU LU and YUNG-KAI LU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
CHEBLI v. KABLE , IV et al
as 1:2021cv00937
Defendant:
DAVID PEKOSKE, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
AHMAD CHEBLI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
MAHONEY v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2021cv00859
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD, KAREN H GIBSON, SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI and others
Plaintiff:
REV. PATRICK J. MAHONEY and PATRICK J. MAHONEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
