Cases 11 - 17 of 17
PARKER v. PHILADELPHIA PREMIUM OUTLET MALL et al
as 2:2011cv06378
Plaintiff:
CHARVEINA VANEL PARKER
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PREMIUM OUTLET MALL , PREMIUM OUTLET CENTERS , CHELSEA LIMERICK HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHEELER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv02430
Plaintiff:
SHAWN R. WHEELER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. , MHM CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
J. SIMMONS and PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Cross_defendant:
EILEEN BRUMBAUGH , JOSEPH KUSTRA and MHM CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv00251
Plaintiff:
VIOLET FOSTER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. , MHM SERVICES, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. , JOHN DOE 6 , MHM SERVICES, INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
MHM SERVICES, INC. and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
MHM CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC.
Thirdparty_defendant:
JONATHAN JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GALARZA v. SZALCZYK et al
as 5:2010cv06815
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO GALARZA
Defendant:
MARK SZALCZYK, STEPHANIE FRITZGES, ICE DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv04748
Plaintiff:
ALBERT JONES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANDERSON, DARNELL WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BISTRIAN v. WARDEN TROY LEVI et al
as 2:2008cv03010
Plaintiff:
PETER BISTRIAN
Defendant:
WARDEN TROY LEVI, TRACY BROWN, BLACKMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
MANELSKI et al v. TINICUM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2007cv01487
Plaintiff:
DENISE MANELSKI, DENISE MANELSKI, DENISE MANELSKI and others
Defendant:
TINICUM TOWNSHIP, TINICUM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, PETER J. BILLBROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
