Other Civil Rights Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Harper v. Pepco et al
as 1:2015cv01916
Plaintiff: Montorey Danyell Harper
Defendant: Pepco, Verizon, Pacific Gas and Electric and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duke v. Hamil et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01663
Plaintiff: Rex Duke
Defendant: Bobby Hamil and Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
Morgan v. Dukes et al
as 1:2013cv00592
Plaintiff: Christina Morgan
Defendant: O. L. Dukes, The City of Clarkston Police Department and John and/or Jane Doe's 1-5
Dukes v. Bennett et al
as 1:2012cv02517
Plaintiff: Treneshia Dukes
Defendant: Suzanne Bennett, Nicholas Deaton , Steve Branham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Columbus Regional Healthcare System, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00028
Plaintiff: Reginald Williams and Nicole Williams
Defendant: Columbus Regional Healthcare System, Inc. , Doctors Hospital , Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dean v. The United States et al
as 1:2009mi00277
Plaintiff: Thomas G. Dean
Defendant: The United States, The State of Georgia, Douglas County, Georgia and others
Movant: C T Corporation System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to interfere with civil rights
Duke Realty Limited Partnership v. City of East Point, Georgia et al
as 1:2009cv01573
Plaintiff: Duke Realty Limited Partnership and Duke Realty Limited Partnership
Defendant: City of East Point, Georgia, Richard Randolph, Karim Kahn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dickerson v. Carl Vinson VA Medical Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00122
Plaintiff: Hattie A. Dickerson
Defendant: James B. Peake, Carl Vinson VA Medical Center, Sue A. Preston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?