Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Butler v. Staes et al
as 4:2020cv04007
Defendant:
John Doe I, Jack Asquini, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jaylan Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gupta v. Kraus et al
as 1:2019cv06651
Defendant:
John Doe (1), Anaisa Alice Claudio, Jason Mitchem and others
Plaintiff:
Ashish Gupta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stovall v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2019cv05196
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, John Doe 2, Union Pacific Railroad Company and others
Plaintiff:
Precious Stovall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Doe #1 et al
as 4:2017cv04202
Plaintiff:
Romaine L. Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Timothy Muehler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrow Jr v. Champaign County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv02086
Plaintiff:
Paul Raymond Farrow Jr
Defendant:
Champaign County Sheriff's Office, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe #1 et al v Murphy et al
as 2:2016cv02393
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #1 , Jane Doe #2 , Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
David Murphy, Robert Windmiller, George McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Jokines et al
as 1:2016cv09656
Plaintiff:
George R. Washington, Jr.
Defendant:
Beatrice D. Jokines, Shelly Washington, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VanDenburgh v. Ogden et al
as 1:2015cv06191
Plaintiff:
Linda S. VanDenburgh
Defendant:
Robert Ogden , City of Highland Park, Village of Bannockburn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carden v. Boyd et al
as 3:2015cv00635
Plaintiff:
Yancy Carden
Defendant:
James Boyd , Village of Washington Park IL , John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. County of Cook, Illinois et al
as 1:2015cv03148
Plaintiff:
Dwayne L. Washington
Defendant:
County of Cook, Illinois , Thomas J. Dart , John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
