Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Murphy et al v. Stamford et al
as 3:2013cv00942
Plaintiff:
Karen A. Murphy and Kathleen A. Murphy
Defendant:
City of Stamford , Board of Assessment Appeals , George Sessa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Macellaio v. Mulhall et al
as 3:2012cv01674
Plaintiff:
Brooklyn Macellaio
Defendant:
Richard Mulhall, Jeanine Allin, Arkadiusz Petlik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nowacki v. Malloy et al
as 3:2011cv01242
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Nowacki
Defendant:
Dannel Malloy, Andrew McDonald, Michael Lawlor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Shinseki et al
as 3:2011cv01035
Plaintiff:
Declan J. Murphy
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki, John Withington and Julius Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Anderson et al v. Old Lyme et al
as 3:2010cv01876
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Anderson , William J. Lacourciere , James Munson and others
Defendant:
Town of Old Lyme, Town of Old Lyme Zoning Commission, Ann C. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamont v. Murphy et al
as 3:2010cv01364
Plaintiff:
Edward Lamont
Defendant:
Brian K. Murphy, Michael Lajoie and Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klemonski, Jr. v. Dagostine et al
as 3:2010cv00913
Plaintiff:
Kevin Klemonski, Jr.
Defendant:
Ralph Dagostine, Carmel Motherway, Scott Semple and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murphy v. Wallingford et al
as 3:2010cv00278
Plaintiff:
Deborah Murphy
Defendant:
Town of Wallingford, Wallingford Bd of Ed, Superintendent of Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Taylor v. Murphy et al
as 3:2010cv00245
Plaintiff:
Derrick Taylor
Defendant:
Brian K. Murphy, Michael LaJoie and Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Obama et al
as 3:2009cv01952
Plaintiff:
Matthew Taylor
Defendant:
Barack Obama, George W. Bush, George H. W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
