Cases 11 - 20 of 48
THURGOOD MARSHALL ACADEMY PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL v. OAKES
as 1:2020cv02755
Plaintiff:
THURGOOD MARSHALL ACADEMY
Defendant:
BRIDGET OAKES
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
DON'T SHOOT PORTLAND et al v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv02040
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIA HESTER, DANIALLE JAMES, BEVERLEY BARNUM and others
Defendant:
L. ERIC PATTERSON, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, DONALD W. WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
BEY v. EASTERLY et al
as 1:2020cv00608
Defendant:
CATHARINE FRIEND EASTERLY, ALICIA LONG, JOSE M. LOPEZ and others
Plaintiff:
ZAFARAH I. BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AZUBUKO v. ZOBEL et al
as 1:2020cv00590
Defendant:
DENNIS MICHAEL FISHER, ROBERT BRUCE KING, JOSEPH F. WEIS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
STEVENSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2019cv00972
Plaintiff:
TREY OSHAE STEVENSON
Defendant:
UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHAL, UNKNOWN MPD EMPLOYEES, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. DIRECTOR, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
as 1:2019cv00649
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Plaintiff:
DIANNE MICHELE CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CADOCHE v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON et al
as 1:2018cv01699
Defendant:
THOMAS A. ADAMS, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, NORMAN ST. GEORGE and others
Plaintiff:
GALIQUOGI' DINAH DEAS CADOCHE and BRIDGETTE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMING v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv01489
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DEAN DEMING
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF OREGON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv00202
Plaintiff:
DONYA WILLIAMS and J.W.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOE U.S. MARSHALS 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BELFER v. MARSHALL et al
as 1:2018cv00108
Plaintiff:
ELLIS S. BELFER
Defendant:
ANDREA I. MARSHALL, KIM GUADAGNO and ANGIE BELFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
