Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Foley v. Rampley et al
as 3:2017cv00403
Plaintiff:
Brett Foley
Defendant:
Meagan Rampley and Louisville-Jefferson County Metropolitan Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pearson v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metropolitan Government et al
as 3:2015cv00671
Plaintiff:
Tamika Pearson
Defendant:
Louisville-Jefferson County Metropolitan Government , Jefferson County Board of Education and Jonathan Hardin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mcelroy v. Cordish Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00390
Plaintiff:
Shelton Mcelroy
Defendant:
Cordish Companies, Inc. , Louisville Irish, LLC , Entertainment Consulting International, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael v. Faulkner et al
as 3:2008cv00453
Plaintiff:
John E. Michael, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Faulkner, Louisville-Jefferson County Metropolitan Government and Louisville Metro Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ramage v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metropolitan Government et al
as 3:2008cv00338
Plaintiff:
Sharon Ramage
Defendant:
Louisville-Jefferson County Metropolitan Government, Louisville-Jefferson County Metropolitan Government, Dan Jackman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Buckminster v. Arnold et al
as 3:2008cv00131
Plaintiff:
Martin Buckminster
Defendant:
Southeast Christian Church, Southeast Christian Church, Louisville-Jefferson County Metropolitan Government and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wooldridge v. Louisville Metro Police Department et al
as 3:2007cv00421
Plaintiff:
John Matthew Wooldridge
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Police Department, Michael Delbert Bonzo and Louisville-Jefferson County Metropolitan Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoback v. McCracken et al
as 3:2007cv00289
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Hoback and Carolyn Hoback
Defendant:
Claudette McCracken and Louisville-Jefferson County Metropolitan Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
