Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Harris v. Roe et al
as 1:2019cv05502
Plaintiff:
Ashley Harris
Defendant:
Ron Freeman and Jeffrey Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson et al v. The Judicial Retirement System of the State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv03836
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Waller, Steven C. Teske, Tracy Graham Lawson and others
Defendant:
Frank F. Thach, Ellen S. Golden, Ron Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson et al v. The Judicial Retirement System of the State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv02591
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Waller, Steven C. Teske, Tracy Graham Lawson and others
Defendant:
Frank F. Thach, Ellen S. Golden, Ron Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rahrer v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2019cv00013
Defendant:
Moore, M. R. Hobbs, Foster and others
Plaintiff:
John J. Rahrer, III
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Rahrer v. Deal et al
as 2:2018cv00117
Defendant:
Leslie Abernathy-Maddox, Janet Bagely, Russel Troy McClelland and others
Plaintiff:
John J. Rahrer, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Papp et al
as 1:2017cv01825
Plaintiff:
Theresa B. Bradley
Defendant:
Daniel Papp, Ken Harmon, Ron Koger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00375
Plaintiff:
Warren Ford
Defendant:
United States of America, John S. Davis, Janis C. Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Jones et al
as 4:2015cv00230
Plaintiff:
Randy Edwards
Defendant:
Jeff Jones , Byron McCarley , Ron Hunton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Ingram v. Regal Cinema Theater et al
as 1:2015cv00146
Plaintiff:
Oprah Ingram
Defendant:
Regal Cinema Theater, Amy E. Miles, Ron Rippo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYNE v. SPRIGGS et al
as 7:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
SUMMER MAYNE
Defendant:
JACKIE SPRIGGS, JAMMIE WILBANKS and RON O'MEARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
