Cases 11 - 20 of 15,303
Henderson v. Johnson
as 3:2024cv01417
Plaintiff:
Tisha Henderson
Defendant:
Eric Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Turner v. Houston Police Department
as 4:2024cv01339
Plaintiff:
Keisha Marie Turner
Defendant:
HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and Tony Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Carson v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Arthur Carson
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Alshaif et al v. City of Post TX et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Abdula Alshaif and Smoke Scene, LLC
Defendant:
City of Post TX, Sheriff Terry Morgan, Patrol Sergeant Travis Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warren v. Buaghman et al
as 4:2024cv02159
Plaintiff:
Andre Omar Warren
Defendant:
Judge Kimberly Dae Buaghman, VENMO and Patrick De Beaudoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McWashington v. Rodgers et al
as 4:2024cv02153
Plaintiff:
Brandon McWashington
Defendant:
Brian G. Curtis, Noe Garza, Melissa A. Hinojosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Mills et al
as 5:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Daniel Mills, Judge Tracie Wright-Reneau, Prosecutor Jennifer Tharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams et al v. Cavazos et al
as 5:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Adams and Stephanie Staubitz
Defendant:
Mayra Cavazos, Rachael Vasquez, Julia Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd Meador v. Pittman
as 3:2024cv01389
Plaintiff:
Laura Kristen Boyd Meador
Defendant:
Mark Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Price v. White et al
as 3:2024cv01387
Plaintiff:
Cherion Price
Defendant:
Iesah White, Antonio Britton, Guadalupe Frias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
