Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Josephson v. Bendapudi et al
as 3:2019cv00230
Defendant:
Beth A. Boehm, Neeli Bendapudi, Gregory C. Postel and others
Plaintiff:
Allan M. Josephson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers et al v. Norman et al
as 5:2018cv00165
Defendant:
Mikey Joe Turnboe, Ryan Norman, Denise Burkett and others
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Clouse and Thomas Myers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Newby
as 5:2017cv00130
Plaintiff:
Edward Tyrone Carter
Defendant:
Jason Newby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Nash Plumbing and Mechanical LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00039
Defendant:
Nash Plumbing and Mechanical LLC, Keith Turner and Greg Ellis
Plaintiff:
Carter and Michael L. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Carter v. Electronic Surveillance Department of the NKDSF et al
as 2:2016cv00144
Plaintiff:
Darlene S. Carter
Defendant:
Electronic Surveillance Department of the NKDSF and FBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carver v. Common Wealth of Kentucky et al
as 1:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Roy Anderson Carver, Jr.
Defendant:
Common Wealth of Kentucky et al, Steve Beshear, Department of Public Advocacy ET AL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caffa-Mobley v. Carter
as 5:2015cv00243
Plaintiff:
Pricilla Caffa-Mobley
Defendant:
Ashton B. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bond et al v. Carter County, KY et al
as 0:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
Brandy Bond and B. E. R. B.
Defendant:
Carter County, KY , Carter County Sheriff's Office and Matthew Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Buckler et al
as 0:2014cv00127
Plaintiff:
Michael Ann Porter
Defendant:
Earl E. Buckler , Casey Brammell , Sheriff of Carter County, Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belt et al v. Carter et al
as 5:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Chris Belt and Mychal Denale Davis
Defendant:
Edward Tyrone Carter, Leslie Allen Duncan and City of Oak Grove, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
