Cases 21 - 30 of 1,451
Craven Casper v. USA, et al
as 24-5051
Plaintiff:
Craven Casper
Defendant:
United States of America and Clerk of Court, United States District Court, District of Columbia
CRAWFORD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAYOR
as 1:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
MIA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAYOR
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
DAVIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL DAVIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, EMMANUEL AGBARA, INNOCENT OPARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DENNIS, JR. v. ALISSA PIERSON DENNIES ESTATE ET AL. et al
as 2:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALOYSIUS DENNIS, JR.
Defendant:
ALISSA PIERSON DENNIES ESTATE ET AL., JAMAUSHIREE DENNIS ESTATE ST AL., MIAH RENEE DENNIS ESTATE ET AL. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J-D. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
S. J-D., SEAN DEWITT and RANITA JAIN
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Walter Allen v. United States District Court for the District of
as 24-5031
Plaintiff:
Walter L. Allen
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Brud Rossmann v. Linda Sapin, et al
as 24-5009
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Ph.D, Philip Pulaski, MD, John Maxwell Finland and others
Inez Qtaish v. United States District Court for the District of
as 24-5017
Plaintiff:
Inez Qtaish
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Bankruptcy Clerks Office
LYLE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
EDWARD W. LYLE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
N. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
L. N., Jessica North Macie and Jani North Saale
Defendant:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
