Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Leverette v. The City of Forest Park, Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv02888
Plaintiff:
Jerome Leverette
Defendant:
The City of Forest Park, Georgia, C. Sloan, Walter Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Couch et al
as 2:2016cv00186
Plaintiff:
David Justin Freeman
Defendant:
Gerald Couch, Jacob Haney, Mike Lusk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meehan v. City of Forest Park et al
as 1:2015cv02706
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Meehan
Defendant:
City of Forest Park , Walter Freeman , Christopher Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Walker et al v. City of Forest Park et al
as 1:2015cv02713
Plaintiff:
Reginald Walker and Jennifer Minor
Defendant:
City of Forest Park , Jeremy Slay , Walter Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Phillips et al v. Lockhart et al
as 1:2015cv00146
Plaintiff:
Terry Phillips , Tamara Parker , Jeffrey Meehan and others
Defendant:
David Lockhart , Shane Clayton , Jeremy Slay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Freeman v. Catoosa, Georgia
as 1:2014cv04016
Plaintiff:
Louis Freeman
Defendant:
Catoosa, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Clayton County Police Dept. et al
as 1:2014cv01242
Plaintiff:
Marcus Bell
Defendant:
Clayton County Police Dept., Freeman Mathis & Gary, Keith Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Lenscrafter
as 4:2013cv00207
Plaintiff:
Felicia D. Freeman
Defendant:
Lenscrafter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Stone et al v. Popular Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02685
Plaintiff:
Christine Stone, David Kevin Shanyfelt, Jeanette P. Bowen and others
Defendant:
Popular Inc., Popular ABS, Inc., The Bank of New York Mellon and others
REEVES et al v. HURST et al
as 5:2013cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES A REEVES and DENISE Y REEVES
Defendant:
DEBRA K HURST, PAMELA J ROGERS and S FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
