Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Oliver v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2009cv01433
Plaintiff:
Kevin Oliver
Defendant:
State Of Connecticut, Dept of Corrections, Brian Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ace Partners, LLC v. East Hartford et al
as 3:2009cv01282
Plaintiff:
Ace Partners, LLC
Defendant:
Town of East Hartford, East Hartford Police Dept, Mark J. Sirois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vega v. Rell et al
as 3:2009cv00737
Plaintiff:
Joe Burgos Vega
Defendant:
M. Jodi Rell, Richard Blumenthal, Steven R. Strom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Murphy v. Kearney et al
as 3:2008cv01486
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Murphy
Defendant:
B. Kearney, M. Koval and R. F. Lawlor
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brisbane et al v. Milano et al
as 3:2008cv01328
Plaintiff:
Marcus Brisbane and Latitia Miller
Defendant:
Robert Milano, Louis Gonzalez, Wayne Newkirk and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tuccio Dev Inc v. Town of Brookfield et al
as 3:2008cv01016
Plaintiff:
Tuccio Dev Inc
Defendant:
Town of Brookfield, Brookfield Inland Wetlands Comm, Brookfield Planning Comm and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Klimas v. Lantz et al
as 3:2008cv00694
Plaintiff:
Daniel Klimas
Defendant:
Theresa C. Lantz, Peter J. Murphy and Michael P. Lajoie
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Matthews v. Lantz et al
as 3:2007cv01378
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Matthews
Defendant:
T. Lantz, David Strange, Iweka and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Kinsman v. Lantz et al
as 3:2007cv00793
Plaintiff:
Stuart Kinsman
Defendant:
Theresa C. Lantz, Carol Salsbury, Giovanny Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joslyn v. Murphy et al
as 3:2007cv00305
Plaintiff:
Robert Joslyn
Defendant:
Brian Murphy, Matthew Regan, Nelson Correia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
