Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Bratcher v. Polk County et al
as 3:2020cv02056
Defendant:
Polk County, Michael H Smith, City of Salem and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bratcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kazalonis v. Harney County Oregon et al
as 2:2020cv01605
Defendant:
Charles V. Smith, Unknown Assistant District Attorney for Harney County Oregon, Brian J. Needham and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Kazalonis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Gill et al
as 6:2020cv00906
Defendant:
Richard Fredricks, Gregory Magnus, Incorporated City of Eugene and others
Plaintiff:
Alexi Elias Ghenatos, Christina Chapman, Amanda Dupray-Raley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobadilla v. Smith Frozen Foods, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00100
Defendant:
Jerry Hahn, Kelly Hahn and Smith Frozen Foods, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Juan Angel Bobadilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. Consumer Cellular
as 3:2019cv01559
Plaintiff:
Charmane Smith
Defendant:
Consumer Cellular
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al
as 6:2019cv01458
Defendant:
Patrick D. Smith and City of Birmingham
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al
as 6:2019cv01407
Defendant:
Patrick D. Smith and City of Birmingham
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simington v. Coos County et al
as 6:2019cv00960
Defendant:
City of Coquille P.O Douglas Miller, Supervising Sergeant Toby Floyd, Coquille P.O. Charlie Carnahan and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Simington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pounds v. Smith et al
as 6:2019cv00420
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services, Brian Light and Cameron Smith
Plaintiff:
Van Pounds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briah v. Washington County Oregon
as 3:2019cv00389
Plaintiff:
Raziel Briah and Scott Smith
Defendant:
Washington County Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
