Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Giese v. City of Kankakee et al
as 1:2019cv01245
Defendant:
Lt Nathan Boyce, City of Kankakee and Chief damon schuldt
Plaintiff:
Michelle Giese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton v. Illinois State Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv02168
Defendant:
Chief Judge John Doe, Illinois State Police Department, J Kokos and others
Plaintiff:
Demarco Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Anderson et al
as 1:2019cv03606
Defendant:
Christina Anderson, Pat Anos, Mary Connelly and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Kelly v. Chief of Police Talley et al.,
as 1:2019cv03163
Defendant:
Chief of Police Talley, Maywood Police Dept. and Area Towing
Plaintiff:
James Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baumgartner v. Ellingson et al
as 3:2019cv50044
Defendant:
Chief Shane Woody, Ryan Davenport, The City of Belvidere and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Baumgartner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Umberger v. Mitchell, et al
as 1:2019cv01045
Plaintiff:
Ryan Umberger
Defendant:
Fmr. Lieutenant Steven Roegge, Fmr. Sergeant Bradford Venson, Fmr. Captain Michael Scally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Baxter et al
as 3:2019cv00131
Plaintiff:
Antoine Johnson
Defendant:
Chief of Police of East St. Louis, Alvin Park, East St. Louis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. City of Decatur et al
as 2:2019cv02022
Defendant:
Chief Judge John Doe, Decatur Police Officers, City of Decatur and others
Plaintiff:
John Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Mattis et al
as 3:2019cv03014
Defendant:
Joint Chiefs of Staff and General James N Mattis
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Dunford et al
as 3:2019cv03016
Defendant:
Joseph F Dunford and Joint Chiefs of Staff
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
