Other Civil Rights Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 31 - 40 of 90
JONES et al v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2018cv01888
Plaintiff: CELESTE JONES and AUTUMN JONES
Defendant: STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. STATE OF MARYLAND
as 1:2018cv01639
Defendant: STATE OF MARYLAND
Plaintiff: CELESTE JONES and AUTUMN JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEOTIE v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01521
Defendant: RUBIN LUBIN, OCWEN MORTGAGE, NATURES POINT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff: ABYOKE LEOTIE and KEISHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHAAP v. CAESAR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00834
Plaintiff: KEVIN SCHAAP
Defendant: ANGELA D. CAESAR, B. DAVIS, A. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS et al
as 1:2018cv00017
Plaintiff: SHONTA JONES and S. C.
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS and ST COLETTA OF GREATER WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
ROSSMANN v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2018cv00025
Plaintiff: BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant: DONALD JOHN TRUMP, NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ASHEESH AGARWAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. BRIDGEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2017cv01468
Plaintiff: MATTHEW N.P. JONES
Defendant: BRIDGEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. BIDEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01185
Plaintiff: MATTHEW N.P. JONES
Defendant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN and OFFICE OF THE U.S. VICE PRESIDENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00328
Plaintiff: MATTHEW JONES
Defendant: SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. MARKELL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00326
Plaintiff: MATTHEW N.P. JONES
Defendant: JACK MARKELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?