Cases 31 - 40 of 183
Couzens et al v. City of Forest Park, OH et al
as 1:2020cv00546
Plaintiff:
Pastor Victor Couzens and Inspirational Bible Church
Defendant:
Martin Jones, Vada Harris, City of Forest Park, OH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sailor v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2020cv00660
Defendant:
James Purcell, Henry Veverka, fnu Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Ru-el Sailor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Filing Error
as 1:2020cv00659
Defendant:
James Purcell, Henry Veverka, Harry Matlock and others
Plaintiff:
Ru-el Sailor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdurraheem et al v. Jones et al
as 1:2020cv00206
Plaintiff:
Mahaamad Abdurraheem, Lydia Foster and Lynda Foster
Defendant:
Wanda Fish, Rolitha Williams, The Department of Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marks v. Boardman Twp Police Dept et al
as 4:2020cv00431
Plaintiff:
Craig Marks
Defendant:
Deputy Brady Mullholland, Officer Dan Jones, Officer Dan Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Rosiello et al
as 1:2019cv00867
Defendant:
Brandon Jones, David Linnenberg, Triffon Callos and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick et al v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Domestic Division et al
as 2:2019cv03329
Defendant:
Catherine White, Hsiu-Chen Lu, Columbus Division of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Moses McCormick and Mark McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rite Aid Corp., et al.
as 1:2019cv01722
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corp. and Luckys Market LLC
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wagner, II v. Jones et al
as 5:2019cv01324
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wagner, II
Defendant:
Kristy Jones, Aaron Kovalchik and Louis Giavasis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
as 2:2019cv01104
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tawny Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
