Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Turpen et al v. Douglas County et al
as 1:2010cv01815
Plaintiff:
Tommy E. Turpen, Jr. and David Logan Turpen
Defendant:
Douglas County, Tom Worthan, Freddie Ashmon, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. The City of East Point et al
as 1:2009cv03629
Plaintiff:
Ray F. Ransom
Defendant:
The City of East Point, Leander Robinson, Hugh Riley and others
Ransom v. The City of East Point et al
as 1:2009mi00539
Plaintiff:
Ray F. Ransom
Defendant:
The City of East Point, Leander Robinson, Hugh Riley and others
Howell v. Houston County, Georgia et al
as 5:2009cv00402
Plaintiff:
Shamel Howell, Shamel Howell and Shamel Howell
Defendant:
Houston County, Georgia, Cullen Talton, Houston County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buccini v. Schlossberg et al
as 1:2009cv01015
Plaintiff:
Karolina Kennedy Buccini
Defendant:
Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg, Edwin Schlossberg, Rose Schlossberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buccini v. Schlossberg et al
as 1:2009mi00134
Plaintiff:
Karolina Kennedy Buccini
Defendant:
Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg, Edwin Schlossberg, Rose Schlossberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Godwin et al
as 7:2008cv00116
Plaintiff:
Christa Donnell Graham
Defendant:
L. E. Godwin, Lynwood Yates, Nole Cook and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chung v. Graham et al
as 1:2008cv01896
Plaintiff:
Paul Chung
Defendant:
Bart L. Graham, Bart L. Graham, Bart L. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
George v. Graham
as 1:2007cv02977
Plaintiff:
Louis George, Jr.
Defendant:
Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Doe et al
as 1:2007cv02880
Plaintiff:
Cherl Mitchell
Defendant:
Abe Doe, Bob Doe, Carl Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
