Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Mulliniks v. Coweta County, Georgia et al
as 3:2015cv00160
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dale Mulliniks
Defendant:
Coweta County, Georgia, City of Grantville, Georgia, Scott Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HICKS
as 1:2015cv00147
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BERNARD HICKS
Defendant:
MARCUS E LEMACKS, JOHN MUCCI, JOHN AND OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSLEY v. HENRY et al
as 1:2015cv00141
Plaintiff:
EVA M MOSLEY
Defendant:
T HENRY, JASMINE PROCTOR, T WHITLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potter v. Columbia County et al
as 1:2015cv00107
Defendant:
Grovetown Department of Public Safety, Columbia County, Columbia County, Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Amon Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. BLEDSOE et al
as 7:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
TONY TAYLOR
Defendant:
BLEDSOE, KROOK, KACKENMEISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GIDDENS et al v. LAWSON et al
as 7:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
RICKY GIDDENS and LYDIA GIDDENS
Defendant:
HUGH LAWSON, W LOUIS SANDS, THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FLEWELLEN v. MACON BIBB GEORGIA et al
as 5:2015cv00086
Plaintiff:
SHAWN FLEWELLEN
Defendant:
MACON BIBB GEORGIA, CITY OF MACON, MIKE BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
STONER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STONER
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHIQUITA A FYE, NORMAN HOWARD FITZ-HENLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DOUGLAS v. CITY OF AMERICUS GEORGIA et al
as 1:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
BRANDON KENTRELL DOUGLAS
Defendant:
CITY OF AMERICUS GEORGIA, SUMTER COUNTY GEORGIA, BARRY BLOUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PENNYMAC CORPORATION v. ARNOLD et al
as 1:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
PENNYMAC CORPORATION ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
JOE ARNOLD and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
