Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Williamson v. Jones et al
as 4:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
Norris Williamson
Defendant:
Malcom Jones and Sue Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norrid et al v. Troxel et al
as 6:2017cv00401
Plaintiff:
Shane Norrid , Kermit Michael Troxel , Kevin Hartman and others
Defendant:
D.A.R.P., Inc., , Raymond Jones , Hendren Plastics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595
Copeland et al v. C.A.A.I.R. et al
as 4:2017cv00564
Plaintiff:
Arthur Copeland , Brandon Spurgin , Brad McGahey and others
Defendant:
C.A.A.I.R., Simmons Foods, Inc., Simmons Pet Food, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cornforth v. Clark et al
as 5:2017cv00888
Plaintiff:
Richard L Cornforth
Defendant:
Traci Clark, Phil Cole, William Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Jackson et al
as 5:2016cv01109
Plaintiff:
Olivia J Taylor
Defendant:
Don Jackson, FNU Graves, FNU Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steele v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv01238
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline A Steele
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Robert Patton, Kameron Harvanek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doane v. Davis et al
as 4:2015cv00501
Plaintiff:
Scotty Lee Doane
Defendant:
John Davis, Kelly Birch, David Simms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 5:2015cv00844
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Allegheny County Department of Court Records, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Brandly v. Canton City of et al
as 5:2015cv00613
Plaintiff:
William Brandly
Defendant:
Canton City of , Deborah Acord , Melina Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nieves et al v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2015cv00614
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Nieves and Megal Lynn Jones
Defendant:
Lawton City of, James T Smith, Albert Nease and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
