Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Sharpe v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
Robert D Sharpe
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of and Bill Citty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2012cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Hill
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of and Bill Citty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summerlin v. Billings et al
as 6:2011cv00395
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Summerlin
Defendant:
Craig Billings , Jay "J.J." McClure and C. Darrin Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Vann v. Wieneke et al
as 4:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
Tony L Vann
Defendant:
Dennis L Wieneke, Peggy L Wieneke, Randle Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Layden et al
as 6:2011cv00088
Plaintiff:
Melissa Phillips
Defendant:
Bill Layden, Jo Kerns and Richard Bedford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Wilson v. Citty et al
as 5:2010cv01330
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Wilson
Defendant:
Bill Citty , Oklahoma City, City of , Matthew McRorie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cook v. Upton et al
as 6:2010cv00445
Plaintiff:
Newton Jr. Cook
Defendant:
Darin Upton, Jon Paul Bogeman, Josh Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brock et al v. Park et al
as 6:2010cv00408
Plaintiff:
Gary Cleave Brock , William Allan Brock , Elwonda Faye Brock and others
Defendant:
Terry Park, Bill Booker, Kevin Antwine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas et al v. State of Oklahoma (ex rel) et al
as 6:2010cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jack Douglas , Deborah Douglas and M. D.
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma (ex rel) , Oklahoma Department of Human Services , Jerral Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Greer v. State of Oklahoma (ex rel) et al
as 6:2010cv00300
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Greer
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma (ex rel) , Oklahoma Department of Human Services , Jerral Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
