Cases 41 - 50 of 3,765
Smyth v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smyth
Defendant:
Kristen Daniels, O'Shea and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pini-Hernandez v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01775
Plaintiff:
Angela Pini-Hernandez
Defendant:
The City of Chicago and R. Kimble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Janeen Brown
Defendant:
City of Chicago, M Lopez and C McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dabney v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
MARK DABNEY
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, A. REGALADO and J.A. REYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Roxanne K Miller
Defendant:
Ivan Gonzalez, Ioan Nemes, Eric Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hendrick v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00867
Plaintiff:
Tommie Hendrick and Tommie Hendrick, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Michael Donnelly and Richard Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. Hanrahan et al
as 1:2024cv02020
Plaintiff:
Ashley Roberts
Defendant:
Star No. 2332 Hanrahan, Unknown Chicago Police Officers, The City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Beverly v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Derrick Beverly
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Antonio Godinez Star No. 19613, Frank Bogatitus Star No. 17956 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De Avila v. Murphy et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Jamie de Avila
Defendant:
Timothy Murphy and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Whitley et al
as 1:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
William Whitley and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
