Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Cuevas v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00346
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific, LLC, John Doe I, Otis Green, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Horacio Delgado Cuevas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Green v. City of East Point, Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv05605
Defendant:
City of East Point, Georgia, Officer Rodney Etienne, Chief Tommy Gardner, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Green et al
as 1:2019cv04407
Defendant:
Dr. R. Stephen Green, Pamela Benford, John and Jane Doe[s] and others
Plaintiff:
Davion Battle
Pugh v. Green et al
as 4:2019cv00251
Plaintiff:
Gerard J. Pugh
Defendant:
Detective Greg Thomas, Detective Michael L. Green, Savannah Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmond v. State of Georgia, Department of Human Resources Child Support Division et al
as 1:2019cv04220
Defendant:
Cassandra Mathis, Mrs. Green, State of Georgia, Department of Human Resources Child Support Division and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Edmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REID v. REPUBLIC BANK AND TRUST INC et al
as 3:2019cv00078
Plaintiff:
RHONDA REID
Defendant:
KATHY JOHNSON, REPUBLIC BANK AND TRUST INC, MARIA SANTOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. WIMBERLEY et al
as 1:2019cv00127
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GREEN
Defendant:
JERRY CARTER and RYAN WIMBERLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYNOLDS v. ADEL GEORGIA et al
as 7:2019cv00091
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, CHAD CASTLEBERRY, ADEL GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff:
SYDARIUS REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Meadows et al
as 1:2019cv01957
Plaintiff:
Dwight Green
Defendant:
Special Agent Danny Garnett, Elaine Snow, Jeff Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifton et al v. Green
as 1:2019cv01577
Plaintiff:
Randell Clifton, John Bradley, Josh Clifton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
