Cases 41 - 50 of 94
ARISTACARE AT MANCHESTER, LLC et al v. CONNOLLY et al
as 1:2017cv05463
Plaintiff:
ARISTACARE AT MANCHESTER, LLC and ARISTACARE AT CHERRY HILL, LLC
Defendant:
ELIZABETH CONNOLLY and MEGHAN DAVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
ARISTACARE AT MANCHESTER, LLC et al v. CONNOLLY et al
as 3:2017cv05463
Plaintiff:
ARISTACARE AT MANCHESTER, LLC and ARISTACARE AT CHERRY HILL, LLC
Defendant:
ELIZABETH CONNOLLY and MEGHAN DAVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAYE v. SHIPP et al
as 1:2017cv05257
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant:
US AG FITZPATRICK (NJ), DANIEL GIBBONS, NJ ATTORNEY GENERAL PORRINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FINNEMAN v. FARMER et al
as 1:2017cv01679
Plaintiff:
NASIR FINNEMAN
Defendant:
BLANCHE FARMER, RICHARD JOSSELSON, CHARLES SHIMBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOLENTINO v. TOWNSHIP OF LONG HILL
as 2:2016cv09017
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TOLENTINO
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF LONG HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAYE v. HOFFMAN et al
as 1:2016cv07771
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant:
MELFI , MICHAEL SHIPP, MICHAEL FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAZUR v. TOWNSHIP OF MARLBORO et al
as 3:2016cv05527
Plaintiff:
MAZUR and MARLENE MAZUR
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF MARLBORO, CHIEF OF POLICE BRUCE E. HILL, DONNA GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SUSAN AND WILLIAM R. REMPHREY v. TOWNSHIP OF CHERRY HILL et al
as 1:2016cv03084
Plaintiff:
SUSAN AND WILLIAM R. REMPHREY
Defendant:
CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, FRANCIS MADISON and JOHN DOES 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STRAWBRIDGE v. CHERRY HILL FBI OFFICE et al
as 1:2016cv01378
Plaintiff:
KEVIN STRAWBRIDGE
Defendant:
CHERRY HILL FBI OFFICE and PATCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROMAN v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2016cv01110
Plaintiff:
ADRIANO ROMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANTHONY CAMPOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
