Cases 41 - 50 of 55
MOSLEY v. PROCTOR et al
as 1:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
EVA M MOSLEY
Defendant:
JASMINE PROCTOR, T WHITLOCK, T HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. FRANKLIN COUNTY et al
as 3:2014cv00095
Plaintiff:
TONY LYNN SMITH
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY, STEVE D THOMAS, NICHOLE FORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUE vs. CAMP, et al.
as 1:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
LAURIE SMITH CAMP, JOHN M GERRARD, F A GOSSETT, III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
DUE v. CAMP et al
as 1:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
LAURIE SMITH CAMP, JOHN M GERRARD, F D GOSSETT, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villanueva-Contreras v. City of Doraville, Georgia et al
as 1:2014cv00885
Plaintiff:
Luis Alfonso Villanueva-Contreras
Defendant:
City of Doraville, Georgia, Jon A. Nalepa, John King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS et al v. Chattahoochee Judicial Circuit et al
as 4:2014cv00009
Plaintiff:
JAMES R THOMAS, JR and SABRINA R THOMAS
Defendant:
Chattahoochee Judicial Circuit, NATHAN DEAL, SAM OLENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick v. Brown et al
as 1:2013cv00176
Plaintiff:
David Frederick
Defendant:
Demond Brown, Rachel Hardin (Brooks), Phillip W. Hambrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins et al v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY et al
as 1:2013cv00124
Plaintiff:
Janice Jenkins and TYRONE SUTTON, JR
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY , JOHN AND OR JANE DOE , COUCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLOODWORTH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LAMAR BLOODWORTH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morgan v. Dukes et al
as 1:2013cv00592
Plaintiff:
Christina Morgan
Defendant:
O. L. Dukes, The City of Clarkston Police Department and John and/or Jane Doe's 1-5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
