Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Zeis v. Springfield Township, Ohio et al
as 5:2016cv02331
Plaintiff:
Haydn Zeis
Defendant:
Springfield Township, Ohio , Robert Scherer , John A. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Midell et al v. Hamilton County Department of Job and Family Services et al
as 1:2016cv00704
Plaintiff:
Robert Midell
Defendant:
Hamilton County Department of Job and Family Services, Hamilton County, Greg Hartmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Scott et al
as 1:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
Ruby Hicks
Defendant:
Doris A Scott , Justin T Moore , Benjamin M. Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. City of Conneaut et al
as 1:2016cv01162
Defendant:
City of Conneaut , Charles Burlingham , Denny R. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorrell v. Moore et al
as 2:2016cv00401
Plaintiff:
Wes Sorrell
Defendant:
Eric Moore, Joseph Echenrode, Thomas Quinlan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes et al v. Hollywood Casino et al
as 3:2016cv00464
Plaintiff:
Kiesha L. Holmes, Kohrea L. McKinney and Dwann Moore
Defendant:
Hollywood Casino, Milisa Winter and Ryan Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Moore v. Licking County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
Chad A. Moore
Defendant:
K. Boerstler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Pullins v. Franklin County, Ohio et al
as 2:2015cv02919
Plaintiff:
April Pullins
Defendant:
Franklin County, Ohio, Franklin County Board of Commisioners, Zach Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrow v. Living Word Church et al
as 3:2015cv00341
Plaintiff:
Samuel Barrow
Defendant:
Living Word Church , Cashland Financial Services, Inc , Pat Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Moore v. Holmes et al
as 1:2015cv01895
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Marie Moore
Defendant:
Keith Holmes, Officer Sycz and Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (RTA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
