Cases 51 - 60 of 80
Johnson v. Goodwin-Cole Company, Inc
as 2:2014at00296
Plaintiff:
Scott Johnson
Defendant:
Goodwin-Cole Company, Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Inman et al v. Santa Cruz Seaside Company et al
as 5:2013cv03235
Plaintiff:
Angie Inman , Corey Inman , Jon Inman and others
Defendant:
Santa Cruz Seaside Company, Roger Barrera, Kaitlyn Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. Miller et al
as 2:2013cv00861
Plaintiff:
E K Wade
Defendant:
Jeff Miller, Gary Ackerman, Sandy Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fortson v. City Attorney Office of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2012cv05256
Defendant:
Bernie Brown, Bernie Brown, Victor Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Ben L Fortson
Cole et al v. State of California, Department of Correctional Safety
as 5:2012cv02086
Plaintiff:
David Cole and Zenobia Cole
Defendant:
State of California, Department of Correctional Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuck v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2012cv00177
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Shuck
Defendant:
Sacramento County Sheriff Department , Walker , Nofsinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuck v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2012at00088
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Shuck
Defendant:
Sacramento County Sheriff's Department , Deputy Walker , Deputy Nofsinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Gomez et al
as 2:2011cv03255
Plaintiff:
Cole S Evans
Defendant:
J Gomez and Ivan Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Gomez et al
as 2:2011at01775
Plaintiff:
Cole S Evans
Defendant:
J Gomez and Ivan Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simon Aragon et al v. County of Los Angeles
as 2:2011cv09247
Plaintiff:
Simon Aragon, Scott Berton, Tae Sil Cheng and others
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Does, Darren Harris and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
