Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Shaw et al v. Kentucky Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control et al
as 1:2011cv00024
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Shaw , Floyd Back and Dr. Vijay Jain
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control , Commonwealth of Kentucky , Thomas H. Skaggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Law Office of Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Mahan et al
as 3:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
Ernest S. Allen
Defendant:
Law Office of Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Mahan, Weber Rose PSC, United States Bankruptcy Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holder v. Hamilton
as 3:2010cv00759
Plaintiff:
Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Defendant:
David Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Anderson et al
as 5:2010cv00207
Plaintiff:
Sammy H. Harris
Defendant:
Scotty Anderson, Nelson O'Donnell and Madison County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salyers v. City of Portsmouth, Ohio et al
as 0:2010cv00055
Defendant:
City of Portsmouth, Ohio, Charles H. Horner, David Thoroughman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flint v. Churchill Downs, Incorporated et al
as 3:2010cv00202
Plaintiff:
Edward H. Flint
Defendant:
Robert L. Evans, William C. Carstanjen, T. Kevin Flanery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Blakemore v. Delahanty et al
as 3:2010cv00179
Plaintiff:
William Blakemore
Defendant:
Sean Delahanty, Joseph O'Reilly, Child Support Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Flint v. Chavin
as 3:2010cv00149
Plaintiff:
Edward H. Flint
Defendant:
A.C. McKay Chavin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flint v. Edwards
as 3:2009cv00956
Plaintiff:
Edward H. Flint
Defendant:
Brian Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Flint v. Armstrong
as 3:2009cv00878
Plaintiff:
Edward H. Flint
Defendant:
David L. Armstrong, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
