Cases 61 - 70 of 110
Martin v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2014cv02812
Plaintiff:
Tremaine E. Martin
Defendant:
A Deane Buchanan and Tiffany A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Hooper
as 4:2014cv02601
Plaintiff:
Mack D'Juan Hill
Defendant:
Lee Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lenz v. City of Willoughby Hills et al
as 1:2014cv01223
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Lenz
Defendant:
City of Willoughby Hills and Robert M. Weger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bickerstaff v. Lucarelli et al
as 1:2014cv00831
Plaintiff:
Brenda Bickerstaff
Defendant:
Vincent Lucarelli, City of Cleveland , John Does No. 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElrath v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00496
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. , J.D. Novak , Chapel Hill Mall and others
Plaintiff:
Tationya McElrath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. Hochul et al
as 4:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
Brian Avery Smith
Defendant:
William J. Hochul, Jr., Maura K. O'Donnell, Richard Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derezic et al v. Ohio Department of Education et al
as 2:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
Aimee Derezic , Jeffrey Pesek , Michelle Roquemore and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Education and Richard A. Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill et al v. Village of Pomeroy, Ohio et al
as 2:2013cv01197
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Hill and Nancy J. Hill
Defendant:
Village of Pomeroy, Ohio , Pomeroy Village Counsel, Ohio , Pomeroy Water Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hill v. Bethel Village of et al
as 1:2013cv00543
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Hill
Defendant:
Bethel Village of, Nick Neibauer, Mark Planck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGinnis v. City of North College Hill, Ohio et al
as 1:2013cv00423
Plaintiff:
Yolanda McGinnis
Defendant:
North College Hill City of and Ryan Schrand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
