Cases 61 - 70 of 9,347
SWINT v. BOEING et al
as 1:2024cv05278
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES SWINT
Defendant:
BOEING, INTERNATIONAL PAPER, ELON MUSK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIVINGSTON v. BOROUGH OF ELMWOOD PARK
as 2:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY LIVINGSTON
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF ELMWOOD PARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POSYTON v. JOHN DOE 1-Z
as 2:2024cv05229
Plaintiff:
RONALD H. POSYTON, III
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PHILIPPE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2024cv02420
Plaintiff:
ALAN JEAN PHILIPPE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SSID and THE UNION COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLANEY et al v. YOUSSEF et al
as 2:2024cv05120
Plaintiff:
MARY BLANEY and MAROSE REALTY CORP
Defendant:
DOHA YOUSSEF, VALLEY BANK, ANTHONY BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LIVINGSTON v. HIBBERT-LIVINGSTON
as 2:2024cv01216
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY LIVINGSTON
Defendant:
ANN-MARIE SOPHIA HIBBERT-LIVINGSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOCCHINO v. CITY OF WILDWOOD et al
as 1:2024cv05225
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BOCCHINO
Defendant:
CITY OF WILDWOOD, WILDWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF ROBERT REGALBUTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SESSION et al v. WILLINGBORO TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SESSION and JEANETTE SESSION
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WILLINGBORO, IAN BUCS, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. MAHON et al
as 2:2024cv02159
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RENEE MAHON, JEFF DAVIDSON, JESSICA WROBLEWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MITROS v. MCCONNELL et al
as 1:2024cv04996
Defendant:
JENNIFER H. MCCONNELL, KEVIN T. MCCONNELL, HOLLY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
