Cases 81 - 90 of 630
ALEJANDRO v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
as 1:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEJANDRO v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2022cv01040
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEJANDRO v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2022cv01020
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEJANDRO v. FBI
as 1:2022cv01002
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
FBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEJANDRO v. BIDEN
as 1:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEJANDRO v. UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
as 1:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santana v. Exodus Transitional Community, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01734
Plaintiff:
Fernando Santana
Defendant:
Exodus Transitional Community, Inc., Julio Medina, Kathleen Bernier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEJANDRO v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2022cv00899
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEJANDRO v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2022cv00824
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J.A.M. et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
J.A.M., O.A.M. and Thelma Medina Navarro
Defendant:
United States of America, Unknown Customs and Border Protection Officer 1, Unknown Customs and Border Protection Officer 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act (Definitions)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
