Cases 1 - 10 of 14
STRIPLIN v. WRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, KAMALA D. HARRIS, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
STRIPLIN v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
AAREN STRIPLIN and AARON WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., KAMALA HARRIS, ROBERT MUELLER and others
BLAIR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv01574
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALAN BLAIR
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, KEVIN PERALTA, CLAUDY TOUSSAINT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SCHIFF v. BLAIR et al
as 1:2022cv03845
Defendant:
GRAHAM SCHIFF, RICHARD BLAIR, PAUL COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
FLORENDO-ONG v. IL-USA et al
as 1:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN FLORENDO-ONG
Defendant:
116th/117th US CONGRESSIONAL 535 MEMBERS, 177 MEMBERS IL G.A., CECILIA ABUNDIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
BLAIR-SCOTT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02258
Defendant:
LAUREN GRIFFIN, VIJAY SHARMA and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
SCHEKERA BLAIR-SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ARNOLD, et al v. SECRETARY OF THE NAVY et al
as 1:2019cv02755
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DUFOUR, ANDREW CALHOUN, TIMOTHY DEMY and others
Defendant:
NAVY CHIEF OF CHAPLAINS, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY and CHIEF OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SIBLEY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2016cv00572
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
RICHARD W. ROBERTS and ANGELA D. CAESAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
SIBLEY v. MCCONNELL et al
as 1:2015cv00730
Defendant:
MITCH MCCONNELL and JOHN A. BOEHNER
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
