Cases 1 - 10 of 12
FLORES v. GOLDEN et al
as 1:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
VALERIE FLORES
Defendant:
ERIC GOLDEN, ISIAIH CRUM and REBECCA FABBRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLORES v. CITY OF MADISON et al
as 1:2023cv03276
Plaintiff:
VALERIE FLORES
Defendant:
CITY OF MADISON, CITY OF MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAMUEL KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
FLORES v. UPMC HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2023cv02626
Plaintiff:
VALERIE L. FLORES
Defendant:
UPMC HOSPITAL and ALLEGHENY COUNTY POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLORES v. DUCKETT et al
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
RUDY FLORES
Defendant:
NOAH DUCKETT and BYRON ALARCON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HEREDIA MONS et al v. MCALEENAN et al
as 1:2019cv01593
Defendant:
NATHALIE ASHER, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN and others
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN TOLEDO FLORES, M.R.M.H., DOUGLAS ENRIQUE PUCHE MORENO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
CLARK v. CUEVA et al
as 1:2018cv01460
Plaintiff:
HELGA G. SUAREZ CLARK
Defendant:
CARLOS CASTELLON CUEVA, RORY LAZO BUSTAMENTE, NILO PARAVICINO ALARCON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADAMS v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2014cv00433
Plaintiff:
DALE BRENT ADAMS
Defendant:
NELDA MARTINEZ, CARLOS VALDEZ, FLOYD SIMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
as 1:2014cv00239
Plaintiff:
ERIC FLORES
Defendant:
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv01989
Plaintiff:
IRMA FLORES
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHAEL HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLORES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2011cv00156
Plaintiff:
ANGELA FLORES
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
