Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Adams et al v. Cook County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Chatara Adams, Monica Aguilar, Carol Allen and others
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Office and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Jackson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv04337
Plaintiff:
Dennis Jackson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Patrick Boyle, Jennifer Burmistrz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karri v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Usha Soujanya Karri
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Debra B. Walker, William Yu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyle v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2021cv06011
Plaintiff:
Brie Boyle and Brian Boyle
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Turner v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv00704
Defendant:
Bryan Vielman, Curtis Weathersby, Andrew Khalifeh and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyle v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv05234
Plaintiff:
COLIN BOYLE
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO and KERRY POZULP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robbins v. Peters et al
as 3:2020cv03151
Plaintiff:
Chad James Robbins and Chad Robbins
Defendant:
Timothy Day, Zachary Boyle, Charles Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penny v. Pelosi et al
as 2:2020cv02047
Defendant:
Antonio Delgado, Sharice Davids, Cheri Bustos and others
Plaintiff:
David H Penny and David Harold Penny
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowden v. Rimsky et al
as 1:2020cv00929
Defendant:
Brian Schnier, City of Chicago, Nicholas Boyle and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bowden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Talavera v. Merola et al
as 1:2020cv00855
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Matthew M. Zeiger, Martin J. Boyle and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Talavera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
